The messages from the “feeling function”

The feeling function is the function in the personality that sorts out our feelings. But where do these feelings come from?

As Jungian analyst James Hollis says in his book Living Between Worlds, we do not create feelings. He says the feeling function provides “spontaneous, autonomous, qualitative, evaluative analyses as to how the psyche is registering the moment.”

Other people, outer circumstances, and our complexes can push us in directions that may be the “right things” as defined by others, but are dead places for our soul. This causes depletion of our most precious resource: our soul’s energy. Boredom, insomnia, depression or other symptoms may arise.

The solution isn’t to suppress our feelings or take palliative measures. Instead Hollis encourages us to ask ourselves: Why have they come? What is their critique? What do they want from us?

Your feeling function is autonomous and continually weighs in with its opinion. The important thing is to be attuned to your feelings regardless of what kind of feeling function you have in your personality type.

Click here to see the book summary I wrote on Instagram about Living Between Worlds.

Continue ReadingThe messages from the “feeling function”

The Hero Function of Your Personality Type

The hero is he who is immovably centered – Ralph Waldo Emerson

All of us know what a hero is and, without much effort, can think of individuals we consider heroes and are able to identify hero figures in literature and movies. But we can also look inward to find a hero, because we have a hero within us in the form of the lead/dominant function of our personality.

Jungian analyst John Beebe expanded the four function model of Myers-Briggs to an eight function model of the personality and assigned archetypes to each one. We are the most conscious of our dominant function. In depth psychology the hero archetype represents the ego, so Beebe gave this function the name of the hero archetype. As Jung said, “Consciousness needs a centre, an ego to which something is conscious.” (Psychological Types, paragraph 506).

The hero function, combined with the inferior anima/animus function, forms the “spine” of the personality. This spine, per Beebe, is “the axis of our relation to self.” He says that this spine is a “plumb line of personhood that develops between superior function hero and inferior function anima ]…]When this happens, a personality can bloom, and the personal self will acquire more affective coloration, cohesion, and temporal stability than before.”

Below I’ll list brief descriptions of how each of the eight cognitive functions displays itself in the hero archetype. I included links to my full posts on each function:

Hero Te (Extroverted Thinking) – The environment of things must be efficiently organized and mechanically correct.

Hero Ti (Introverted Thinking) – Intellectual clarity. Life must make technical sense to the individual’s understanding.

Hero Fe (Extroverted Feeling) – The environment of people must be socially friendly.

Hero Fi (Introverted Feeling) – Life must be humanely congruent to the individual’s values.

Hero Ne (Extroverted Intuition) – The environment of patterns must be scanned for alternative hypothetical possibilities. Makes remarkable inferences.

Hero Ni (Introverted Intuition) – Life must be “filled in” by the individual’s subconscious impressions.

Hero Se – The physical environment must be scanned for opportunities for action in the present and tangible experiences.

Hero Si – Recognition of the natural order of things. Life must be familiar to the individual’s storehouse of practical data.

The hero function is the only one of the eight functions that is measured by how strong it is. This will be important to keep in mind while studying the archetypes of the other 7 functions:

As we move beyond the heroic first function, however, we should recognize that not all of the eight functions follow hero psychology in being measurable by their degree of strength.

They do not, in actual experience, follow a descending hierarchy of differentiation from first (superior) through fourth (inferior) to eighth. Rather, the strength, and the kind of strength, a function of consciousness displays is a consequence of the archetypal role associated with it, and archetypes are differently developed in different people. The numbering of the positions is a bit of an anachronism, left over from the early days of Jungian psychology and of Isabel Briggs Myers’s adaptation of that psychology to the analysis of the MBTI findings. When I use numbering today, in these post-heroic times, the numbers are meant to be read as qualitative rather than quantitative, much the way the numbers of streets can be read in a well-differentiated city that one is intimately acquainted with. Thus the ‘second’ and ‘third’ functions are identified, like avenues in New York City, by the qualities experience has taught us to recognize when

p. 135

The opposite of the hero function is the “opposing personality” function, which is the shadow form of the hero function. Studying the opposite, and learning how to integrate it, will enhance your understanding and use of the hero function. My next post will be about the opposing personality function. Stay tuned!

_____________

Source of the Beebe quotes in this post: Energies and Patterns in Psychological Type

Continue ReadingThe Hero Function of Your Personality Type

On Extroverted Feeling and Martin Luther King, Jr.

If you want to see what it looks and feels like at a visceral level when extroverted feeling makes an entrance, the last five minutes of Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream speech is a dramatic example.

According to depth psychologist Jennifer Leigh Selig, who has formally studied Martin Luther King for 18 years, during the first 12 minutes of the speech he stays on script. He had used versions of the I Have a Dream speech in the past, but decided to instead use the speech with the cancelled check metaphor.

After he completes that speech, his close friend Mahalia Jackson leans over and says, “Tell them about the dream, Martin. Tell them about the dream.” He moves the papers aside on his podium and speaks extemporaneously for the final five minutes. That is the five minutes we all know; it’s likely if he had stopped after the first 12 minutes, the speech would not be #1 on American Rhetoric’s top 100 speeches of the 20th century.

The 12:13 mark of the below video is where he makes the shift into extroverted feeling. So you’ll want to watch at least the few minutes preceding that, and preferably the whole thing, so you can get the proper feel for it:

In this shift to extroverted feeling, he transformed himself from a lecturer to a preacher. King’s attorney, Clarence Jones, described the moment like this:

I have never seen him speak the way I saw him on that day. It was as if some cosmic transcendental force came down and occupied his body. It was the same body, the same voice, but the voice had something I had never heard before.

Selig isn’t comfortable typing King even though she has studied him for a long time. She does say: “he functioned most effectively in the public and political arena as an extroverted feeler.”

Does that mean he was INFJ or ENFJ, which are types frequently assigned to him on personality forums? Not necessarily. Selig also says:

In reading King’s autobiographical statements, it is obvious that his thinking function was dominant in his childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood; this is seen most clearly when examining his approach to religion. Jung’s thinking and feeling functions relate to how we make decisions: objectively or subjectively, with the mind or with the heart.

[…] King decided to join the church at five, not because he “believed” nor had any feeling of God, but because he wanted to keep up with his older sister. At thirteen, he questioned the bodily resurrection of Jesus; it simply made no rational sense to him. His studies in college made him even more skeptical of the fundamentalism of religion

Integration: The Psychology and Mythology of Martin Luther King, Jr. and His (Unfinished) Therapy With the Soul of America by Jennifer Leigh Selig, p. 92

In Jungian typology, there is a concept called the “transcendent function.” Marie-Louis von Franz, who was Jung’s close associate for around 30 years, describes it like this:

To the four comes a fifth thing that is not the four, but is something beyond them and consists of them all. That is what the alchemists called the fifth essence, the quintessentia or the philosopher’s stone. It means a consolidated nucleus of the personality that is no longer identified with any of the functions. This is a stepping out, so to speak, of identification with one’s own consciousness and with one’s own unconscious

Lectures on Jung’s Typology by Marie-Louise von Franz and James Hillman

The transcendent function can appear in mid-life and beyond, so it’s likely that was in play during this speech. Selig describes his speaking style in general as one that could open the minds of both thinkers and feelers:

Certainly one reason King was such a powerful speaker was his ability in a single speech or sermon to reach into the hearts of the feelers and address the minds of the thinkers; one reason why King was such a powerful healer was his ability in any given speech to open the minds of the feelers and open the hearts of the thinkers. Only a man who holds those two opposites in harmonious balance within could do as much.

Trying to figure out King’s type is almost impossible to do because of his mythological stature. As Jesse Jackson said: “Thinking about him is like thinking about the prism, the sun shining through a glass from as many angles as you look. You know there is another set of rays, and as many angles as you think about Dr. King, there is yet another set of angles with which to analyze him.”

Instead, we would all do well to ponder how, with our own types, we can create the “beloved community” that was King’s goal by integrating the opposites within ourselves and integrating with others.

Continue ReadingOn Extroverted Feeling and Martin Luther King, Jr.

The 8 archetypes of Extraverted Thinking (Te)

Thinking is a rational, judging function and on the opposite pole of feeling. It organizes experiences and ideas and tends to be intellectual, analytical and impersonal.

The thinking function has no necessary connection with intelligence or the quality of thought, it is simply a process.
Thinking is taking place when one formulates a scientific
concept, reflects on the daily news or adds up a restaurant bill
. It is extraverted or introverted according to whether it is oriented to the object or the subject.

Daryl Sharp, Personality Types: Jung’s Model of Typology, p. 44

Now let’s take a look at Extraverted Thinking (Te).

Extraverted Thinking is mechanistic and is cause-and-effect driven. It creates a world of structured and logical processes and behavior. It can be influenced by societal norms and external experiences.

According to Jungian analyst John Beebe, Te is “interested in definitions that would hold true for everyone, according to ideas everyone might agree with.” Whereas introverted thinking has to “reflect on whether a particular construction really accorded with the conviction of inner truth, regardless of what the received opinion might be.”

At their best, extraverted thinkers are statesmen, lawyers,
practical scientists, respected academics, successful entrepreneurs. They are excellent at establishing order, whether on paper, in their everyday lives, or at a business meeting. With a good sense of facts, they bring clarity into emotional situations. They are assets on any committee; they know Robert’s Rules of Order and when to apply them.


At worst, this type is a religious zealot, a political opportunist, a con man (or woman), a strict pedagogue who brooks
no dissent.

Daryl Sharp, Personality Types: Jung’s Model of Typology, p. 45

Below is the infographic I made that describes all 8 archetypal roles of Te. All personality types have Ti and it behaves differently depending on where it is located. Half of the 16 personalities have it in the top four functions where it is more conscious. The other half have it in shadow.

This concludes the eight part series. Here are my other articles in this series:

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Thinking (Ti)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Feeling (Fi)

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Sensation (Se)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Sensation (Si)

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Intuition (Ne)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Intuition (Ni)

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Feeling (Fe)

Now that I’ve covered the functions, next on my agenda is to write about each of the archetypes (Senex, Trickster, etc.). Stay tuned!

Continue ReadingThe 8 archetypes of Extraverted Thinking (Te)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Thinking (Ti)

Thinking gives clarity to the perceptions and decisions of the feeling function. It tends to be intellectual, impersonal, and analytical.

Thinking needs more information than feeling in order to make a judgement, so it tends to work more slowly than the feeling function.

John L. Giannini, who was a Jungian analyst, described the thinking function in general in this way:

Jung and Myers note that the thinking function lends itself to objectifying, systematizing, categorizing, naming, being logical, responding to ideas, seeking just treatment, observing hierarchies, being firm and tough-minded, being easily able to dismiss subordinates, enjoying policy-making and strategizing, seeking dignity and authority, and generally preferring to lead than follow.”

Compass of the Soul, p. 163

Now let’s take a look specifically at introverted thinking (Ti).

For starters, Carl Jung described introverted thinking as subjective:

This thinking is neither determined by objective data nor directed to them; it is a thinking starts from the subject and is directed to subjective ideas or subjective facts.

Psychological Types, para. 579

Ti trusts its own subjective ideas, its own conclusions, and its own judgments. When in analyzing mode it may appear cold, inflexible, and arbitrary. Ti likes to make things precise and helps the person organize their inner world.

Daryl Sharp, who was also a Jungian analyst, elaborates further on this subjectivity:

Lacking an orientation to outer facts, introverted thinking types easily get lost in a fantasy world. Their subjective orientation may seduce them into creating theories for their own sake, apparently based on reality, but actually tied to an inner image. In the extreme case this image becomes all-consuming and alienates them from others.

Personality Types: Jung’s Model of Typology, p. 71

Next, introverted thinking is about precision and clarity. Daryl Sharp again:

Since their thought process is logical and straightforward, they are especially good at filling in the gaps in the so-called nonlinear or lateral thinking—the leaping from thought to thought—that distinguishes the intuitive. As writers, their forte is not originality of content but rather clarity and precision in the organization and presentation of the available material.

Personality Types: Jung’s Model of Typology, p. 71

Finally, introverted thinking is Socratic in nature. Henry L. Thompson describes Ti in Jung’s Function-Attitudes Explained as: “A philosophical quest for the rational truth through the use of penetrating, systematic questioning and doubt. […] The objective of life is the constant seeking and questioning of truth and its ruling principles.”

Thompson also says that Ti may neglect or force-fit facts and can think it knows the real answers.

Below is the infographic I made that describes all 8 archetypal roles of Ti. All personality types have Ti and it behaves differently depending on where it is located. Half of the 16 personalities have it in the top four functions where it is m ore conscious. The other half have it in shadow.

These archetypes descriptions are just sketches and aren’t meant to be literal. The shadow functions in particular are highly qualitative. Our shadow is unconscious and the contents of each person’s shadow differ, of course.

The shadow functions are a guide for you to understand your complexes better. When you get “triggered,” and it is brought to your conscious attention (usually by another person or by you noticing your own physical reaction), you can try to trace it back to a shadow function and then reverse engineer it further to explore the origin of your complex.

Remember that no function ever acts separately from the other functions. Jung said we almost never see a pure form of a function. We consider a function only in order to better understand the whole of the personality.

This is part 7 of 8 in the series. Here are my other articles in this series:

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Feeling

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Sensation (Se)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Sensation (Si)

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Intuition (Ne)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Intuition (Ni)

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Feeling (Fe)

Continue ReadingThe 8 archetypes of Introverted Thinking (Ti)

The Eight Original Human Needs in Personality Types

Objective Personality isn’t the first to use human needs in personality typing. Perhaps you’ll see some correlations to the four Objective Personality human needs (tribe, identity, control, gather) in these.

Back in 1938, Henry Murray, when he was director of the Harvard Psychology Clinic, developed a personality system based on needs called “personology.” He believed that everyone has a set of universal basic needs, with the uniqueness of an individual’s personality coming from certain needs being more important than others to the individual.

Murray was heavily influenced by Carl Jung and his theory of personality was rooted in psychoanalysis. His work influenced Abraham Maslow in his development of the hierarchy of needs.

The precursor to the CIA (the OSS) paid Murray to write an analysis of Hitler’s personality, drawing from biographies and classified reports.

A short time later he purchased test booklets and answer keys from Isabel Myers. He led a team of wartime psychologists to match agents to missions that best suited their personalities.

The prospective agents came to a farm in Pennsylvania and their real identities weren’t revealed to the others. Murray claimed this anonymity was the only way “to see the person whole and to see him real.”

This operation was all hush-hush and local residents wondered if the farm was an army asylum. There were also rumors that the farm inhabitants were Nazi sympathizers and communists.

The prospective agents were given dozens of assessments, including MBTI. “The staff assigned each subject a role they did not believe he could fulfill successfully based on his personal history, a role that would generate a good deal of tension, anxiety, and embarrassment, thereby short-circuiting each man’s ability to reflect on and alter his natural pattern of behavior.”

Personology was far more nuanced than just the 8 main human needs. He divided them into several binary categories with various secondary needs.

Here are the 8 main needs:

Personology had five principles: 1.) Cerebral physiology; 2.) People cycle between seeking excitement and then relaxing; 3.) An individual’s personality develops over time; 4.) Personality is not fixed and can change; 5.) Each person has unique characteristics and others which are shared by others.

The system of needs influenced the creation of personality tests. By 1956, 60% of corporations were using personality tests. A personality assessment test Murray created, called Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), is still in use today. It uses pictures and the subject is asked to tell a story. The assessor infers personality characteristics from the storytelling.

Murray believed the study of personality should look at the entire person over their whole lifespan. He wrote, “The assessment of men…is the scientific art of arriving at sufficient conclusions from insufficient data.”

_____

Source:

The Personality Brokers: The Strange History of Myers-Briggs and the Birth of Personality Testing by Merve Emre

Continue ReadingThe Eight Original Human Needs in Personality Types

The 8 Archetypes of Introverted Feeling (Fi)

The feeling function is about a lot more than feelings.

In fact, according to Marie-Louise von Franz, a person who seems full of feeling may not be a feeling type at all, but instead a thinking type with inferior feeling.

That’s because a feeling type ” disposes of feelings quite equanimously, may seem utterly devoid of feelings, distant and disinterested. Having feelings and using feeling is the difference between the contents and the process that organizes and expresses the contents.”

Feeling is the psychological process in us that evaluates.Feeling types can be intolerant of new values or deviations from values. A feeler doesn’t simply observe; he passes judgments and brings himself into relationships with what he evaluates. According to von Franz

Feeling types take time, so that often they inhibit movement with their slowness because they tune into an atmosphere. If it is not to their suiting, they subtly impose their feeling world or disturb the one taking place by undercutting it. If they do not like the atmosphere and cannot change it, they may spend the evening in silence, unable to take part at all, meanwhile passing silent judgments, or attempting, if extroverted, to turn things into adapted sociable channels. The importance of ideas, the beauty of wild intuitions, or sensations just as they are, are not enough. Things must be evaluated and related to.

Lectures on Jung’s Typology by Marie-Louise von Franz and James Hillman

Now let’s take a look at introverted feeling (Fi) specifically.

In the book Jung’s Function-Attitudes Explained, Henry L. Thompson says that introverted feeling types are the hardest to understand “because they allow so little of themselves to appear on the surface, and the wall surrounding them is almost impossible to scale.Jung used the phrase ‘Still waters run deep’ when describing this type because ‘their depth of feeling can only be guessed.’ Hillman described them as the ‘deep feelers.'”

Fi types judge people, things, and thoughts by their own internal values and don’t readily conform to society’s values.Jung said that Fi shows “little effort to respond to the real emotions of the other person.” Strangers aren’t show special attention and the easiest place to see Fi express their feelings is with their children. They differ from extroverted feeling (Fe) types in that they don’t enjoy interpersonal closeness with strangers.

According to Thompson, they can be “mistaken for thinking types because of their perceived lack of warmth and friendliness. Their outward appearance might seem cold at times.” They are inclined to shun large gatherings because their Fi becomes numbed when too much comes in at one time.

von Franz says Fi types exert “a positive secret influence on their surroundings.” And they “very often form the ethical backbone of a group, without irritating the others by preaching moral or ethical precepts; they themselves have such correct standards of ethical values that they secretly emanate a positive influence on those around them. One has to behave correctly because they have the right kind of value standard, which always suggestively forces one to be decent if they are present. Their differentiated introverted feeling sees what is inwardly the really important factor.”

Below is the infographic I made that describes all 8 archetypal roles of Fi. All personality types have Fi and it behaves differently depending on where it is located. Half of the 16 personalities have it in the top four functions where it is more conscious. The other half have it in shadow.

Jung’s theory of the functions has a practical value, but it is not dogma, and Jung said we never see the pure form of a function. Furthermore, functions don’t act in isolation, we are usually using more than one function at a time.

This is part 6 of 8 in the series. My other articles in the series:


The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Sensation (Se)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Sensation (Si)

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Intuition (Ne)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Intuition (Ni)

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Feeling (Fe)

Continue ReadingThe 8 Archetypes of Introverted Feeling (Fi)

The 8 archetypes of Extraverted Feeling (Fe)

To look at extraverted feeling in a nuanced way we will explore all 8 of the different roles it plays in the personality. This is per Jungian analyst John Beebe’s 8 function personality type model.

First, here is a refresh on what a function is, as per James Hillman: “A relatively unified, relatively consistent and habitual pattern of performance which enjoys itself in its activity, a pattern that likes to be exercised.” (Lectures on Psychological Type, 1971, p. 91)

Now we’ll look at Fe in general terms. Feeling, along with thinking, is a judging function. Here is Jung’s definition of extraverted feeling, where we see how it differs from introverted feeling in that it is not based on subjective values:

Extraverted feeling has detached itself as much as possible from the subjective factor and subordinated itself entirely to the influence of the object. Even when it appears not to be qualified by a concrete object, it is none the less still under the spell of traditional or generally accepted values of some kind.

(Jung, Psychological Types)

Jungian analyst Daryl Sharp elaborates further:

Extraverted feeling types are generally amiable and make friends easily. They are quick to evaluate what the outer situation requires, and readily sacrifice themselves for others. They exude an atmosphere of warm acceptance, they get the ball rolling at a party. Except in extreme cases, the feeling has some personal quality—there is a genuine rapport with others—even though the subjective factor is largely suppressed. The predominant impression is of a person well adjusted to external conditions and social values.

(Personality Types, Sharp, p. 50 )

Below is the infographic I made that describes all 8 archetypal roles of Fe. All personality types have Fe and it behaves differently depending on where it is located. Half of the 16 personalities have it in the top four functions where it is more conscious. The other half have it in shadow.

These archetypes descriptions are just sketches and aren’t meant to be literal. The shadow functions in particular are highly qualitative. Our shadow is unconscious and the contents of each person’s shadow differ, of course.

The shadow functions are a guide for you to understand your complexes better. When you get “triggered,” and it is brought to your conscious attention (usually by another person) you can try to trace it back to a shadow function and then reverse engineer it further to explore the origin of your complex.

Remember that no function ever acts separately from the other functions. Jung said we almost never see a pure form of a function. We consider a function only in order to better understand the whole of the personality.

This is part 5 of 8 in the series. My other articles in the series:

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Sensation (Se)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Sensation (Si)

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Intuition (Ne)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Intuition (Ni)

Continue ReadingThe 8 archetypes of Extraverted Feeling (Fe)

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Intuition (Ni)

Introverted intuition (Ni) plays one of eight different archetypal roles, depending on which of the 16 personality types you have. This is per Jungian analyst John Beebe’s 8 function personality type model.

First we’ll take a look at intuition and Ni in general terms.

As Jung described in Psychological Types, Intuition, like sensation, is a perceiving function:

“The primary function of intuition, however, is simply to transmit images, or perceptions of relations between things, which could not be transmitted by the other functions or only in a very limited way.”

According to J. Newman: “While sensation is intimately tied to bodily experience (and emotions), intuition is predominantly a mental function, allowing for the perception, not of physical realities, but of symbolic images, ideas and abstractions. These contents of the intuitive process form the basis of mental experience. Intuition is, thus, an “intellectual” process.”

Regarding Ni specifically, Jung said: “It does not concern itself with external possibilities but with what the external object has released within.” And: “introverted intuition perceives all the background processes of consciousness with almost the same distinctness as extraverted sensation registers external objects. For intuition, therefore, unconscious images acquire the dignity of things. But, because intuition excludes the co-operation of sensation . . . . the images appear as though detached from the subject, as though existing in themselves without any relation to him.”

Now let us consider the archetypes of Ni. Below is my distillation of John Beebe’s descriptions

These archetypes are just sketches and aren’t meant to be literal. They depict complexes, so therefore are qualitative.

No function ever acts separately from the other functions. Jung said we al most never see a pure form of a function. We consider a function in order to better understand the whole of the personality.

This is part 4 of 8 in the series. Part five will be about Extroverted Feeling (Fe). Stay tuned!

My other articles in the series:

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Sensation

The 8 archetypes of Introverted Sensation

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Intuition

The 8 archetypes of Extroverted Feeling

Continue ReadingThe 8 archetypes of Introverted Intuition (Ni)

The Abstract Emptiness of Personality Types

“I have become identified with what is not unique … so I seem to have no specific shape that can be grasped individually … Persons in bins can only resemble one another in their communality … within every typological system there lurks abstract emptiness in which we lose our uniqueness.” – James Hillman

You won’t find a more eloquent criticism of personality typology than James Hillman’s essay in From Types to Images.

What makes it even more striking is that he helped found the Jung Institute in Zurich and gave a brilliant lecture about the feeling function. That lecture was first published in 1971, along with Marie von Franz’s lecture on the inferior function, in the book Lectures on Jung’s Typology.

But then in 1980 he published an essay in which he criticized the misuse of typology. Hillman is, above all, known for his writings about soul-making and calling. In that light, typology can seem very much at odds with calling and one’s unique destiny.

Hillman says: “The problem of perceiving the unique is at the heart of therapy. The desire to see and the need to be seen cannot be overestimated. Analysts struggle to see a particular and different self in each patient.”

He also said the problem of human relations is “the experiencing of each other as selves, as individual persons with distinct natures; each person the embodiment of an individual destiny.”

This is where he says we’ve gone wrong in understanding Jung’s Psychological Types book: “His Types was conceived to elaborate differences, variety. Yet it has become an instrument of psychological egalitarianism by means of typical categories into which persons can be fit. The book has … become an instrument of the egalitarianism it is expressly designed to ward off.”

Ouch. I can’t say I disagree. The internet has only exacerbated the problem. The conversations and content about typology are so often about type parts. “I see Ti in how you said that!” And so on. Very little about soul-making and calling.

Hillman again: “Don’t we tend to turn to them [types] when we are most self-occupied, neurasthenic, narcisstically depressed? When we need ego-support? Typologies fascinate and convince because they are methods of mirroring what we most look for – self-perception recognition of our individual image. And the more we gain this insight into our uniqueness and present ourselves as an individual image, the less fascinating and convincing typology: we say, ‘we no longer fit in.'”

This is why type is merely a starting point. When we no longer feel we fit into our particular personality type, perhaps it is because we are seeing our calling all the more clearly.

Continue ReadingThe Abstract Emptiness of Personality Types